First he says that his religion doesn't matter. And then he argues for the establishment of religion by the state.
Oh, I'm sure he would deny that. Of course. He couldn't possibly admit what he's really saying. But when he's claiming that the amazing religious freedom that we enjoy in this country is not enough for him, that he wants more, what is he really saying? Government sponsorship of religion?
I ask you: Would you buy a used car from this guy?