» Pregnant? Need help? Call 1-800-PROPAGANDA

14 February 2006 - 2:05am

Pregnant? Need help? Call 1-800-PROPAGANDA

moiv's picture
By moiv

from Talk to Action

The alarming erosion of any pretense of a wall between church and state here in Texas is evidenced by the state's diversion of $5 million in health care funds to evangelistic crisis pregnancy centers. Despite the standard restrictions on using public funds to proselytize, this lucrative contract is designed to funnel state money into both Protestant and Catholic CPCs, both of which have only two goals: stopping abortion and winning souls for Christ.

And now that movement is poised to go national.

The Democrats for Life of America (DFLA) is waiting in the wings with its 95-10 Initiative, a piece of omnibus legislation that, beneath a veneer of concern for women, provides federal funding for a nationwide campaign to herd women into CPCs, while imposing the so-called Woman's Right to Know laws that are shutting down access to abortion care from Minnesota to Mississippi upon every abortion-providing physician in the 50 states.

Federal Funding for Toll-Free Number/National Public Awareness Program
Enact an advertising campaign in each state to provide a toll free number that will direct a woman to organizations that provide support services for pregnant women who want to carry their children to term and/or direct women to adoption centers.
*Organizations that qualify for the referral from the toll-free hotline must be non-profit, tax exempt organizations that do not provide abortion referral services.

Women's Right to Know
Any women's health center or clinic that provides pregnancy counseling or abortion services must provide accurate information on abortion and the adverse side effects to a woman's health.
:::
Provide Ultrasound Equipment
Provide grants to nonprofit, tax-exempt organizations for the purchase of ultrasound equipment to provide free examinations to pregnant women needing such services. This equipment will be operated by licensed professionals.

It has been my own observation that "women needing such services" are the ones who are induced by a CPC's offer of "abortion aid, assistance and advice" to walk in asking for help with an abortion – and that the addition of licensed professionals would be a marked improvement . . . but that is another story.

DFLA Executive Director Kristen Day makes clear that their goal is to eliminate all elective abortions in the country within 10 years after the passage of 95-10, and that government promotion and funding of CPCs is the most powerful weapon in their arsenal.

Image hosting by PhotobucketCareNet, a nationwide network of crisis pregnancy centers, has also endorsed the 95-10 initiative, with President Kurt Entsminger applauding the proposal's focus on pregnancy resource centers. Legislation arising from the initiative would require abortion centers to inform women of the adverse effects of abortion, and pregnancy counseling centers to provide adoption referral information.

The stated goal of cutting abortions by 95 percent is not an arbitrary aim born of ambition, Ms. Day said, as she stated that 5 percent of abortions are performed due to rape, incest, or maternal health concerns, and that eliminating those in a decade is not realistic.

The DLA (sic) Web site lists six Democratic congressmen and one senator as vocally supportive of the 95-10 initiative.
:::
Should the initiative hiccup at the federal level, DLA plans to promote it state by state, but Ms. Day is optimistic: “Six months ago Democrats wouldn’t even talk about abortion. Now we’re beginning to have a dialogue.�

The pilot program for state by state imposition of the 95-10 Initiative is about to be up and running in Florida – where, in 2004, the then-president of the state's chapter of DFLA, Valerie Mierzwa, called John Kerry the "Hitler of the Unborn." The Florida initiative will be propelled by a savvy operation that makes our CPC initiative here in Texas look like a home-grown outfit. The winner of Florida's $3 million contract is Care Net, a CPC powerhouse with over 800 affiliates in North America.

Florida State Grant Program to Reduce Abortion

STERLING, Va., Feb. 3 /Christian Wire Service/ -- Care Net announced Thursday an unprecedented development regarding the use of marketing and a unique 24-hour call center to help women facing unplanned pregnancies find alternatives to abortion. The State of Florida has allocated $2 million to fund a new program to promote alternatives to abortion and support the work of pregnancy centers throughout Florida. This new program will be administered by the Florida Pregnancy Care Network (FPCN). The Option Line call center, jointly owned and operated by Care Net and Heartbeat International, has been retained by the FPCN to serve as the official call center for this new state program. The Option Line (800-395-HELP) currently receives more than 10,000 calls, e-mails, and instant messages per month from women across North America who are facing an unplanned pregnancy. Now, it will be expanded to serve an even greater number of women in Florida and connect them with the help of a local pregnancy center.

Image hosting by PhotobucketCare Net President Kurt Entsminger praised the State of Florida and those involved in the initiative for its innovation and efficiency. “By utilizing the Option Line, this program will involve a call center that has proven effectiveness in meeting the task at hand: caring for women facing unplanned pregnancy, connecting them with local help, and ultimately, helping to reduce the number of abortions.� Research shows that seven out of ten women who contact the Option Line are considering abortion. After visiting pregnancy centers, most women will choose to carry their pregnancy to term. “Care Net is enthusiastic about this new program, which allows meaningful participation by faith-based organizations. We believe that if this program is tested over time, we will see a significant reduction in the number of abortions in the state of Florida.�

The FPCN will launch an advertising campaign modeled after Option Line marketing efforts. English and Spanish commercials as well as Internet ads will promote a newly-created Florida 1-800 number that will ring directly into the Option Line call center in Columbus, Ohio. All Florida pregnancy centers currently receiving phone calls through the Option Line will be immediately eligible to receive phone calls made to the new 1-800 number.
:::
The Florida program will also involve the reimbursement of qualified pregnancy centers for counseling services that abide by Florida’s faith-based initiative guidelines. The FPCN will allocate the state funds to those pregnancy centers that wish to participate and have been trained and approved by the FPCN.

In Kurt Entsminger, Jeb Bush's Florida has definitely picked a man who can spread a message.

An example of the way that paid search marketing can effectively stretch a ministry's advertising dollars is the work being done via Google AdWords and Yahoo! Search Marketing by Care Net, which runs a national crisis pregnancy hotline. Kurt Entsminger, the president of Care Net, shares that since the mid-90's Care Net had relied primarily upon billboards, television and Yellow Pages as the primary means of promoting its hotline. The cost per call from their marketing efforts ranged from $15 to $80. Care Net considered any campaign with a cost per call of less than $25 to be successful. Since the company adopted paid search marketing last year, they have seen their ppc-related cost per call drop to just $5.

Entsminger explains that the benefits of paid search advertising go beyond lowering marketing costs. "Not only is Internet advertising producing calls at much less expense, it is also proving most successful in reaching our target audience of women in crisis pregnancies."

No, never let it be said that Kurt Entsminger doesn't understand marketing. Last year Care Net announced a partnership with Interstate Batteries that has seen Care Net profit from expanding its national exposure through NASCAR-related sponsorship – and instead of paying for that endorsement in the customary manner, Care Net is receiving a large share of its co-sponsor's profits.

Image hosting by Photobucket

This fall, Interstate Batteries and Care Net have teamed up to launch "Charged for Life," a new fundraising campaign to help support the work of pregnancy centers across the U.S. and Canada. The strategic partnership was kicked off at the NASCAR race in Martinsville, Va. where the Interstate Batteries car featured Care Net's name and logo. Image hosting by Photobucket
"Interstate Batteries is a great role model for companies seeking to make a difference in local communities," said Care Net President Kurt Entsminger.

Only last year, Entsminger expressed doubt about the ability of Care Net to take government money in Florida without compromising its "evangelistic goals."

Mr. Entsminger told WORLD that in the past Real Alternatives "has excluded evangelical centers all together." Mr. Bagatta said that's because until last summer federal guidelines prohibited the group from distributing funds to "centers that proselytize." Under new guidelines from the Office of Faith-Based Initiatives, Mr. Bagatta said Real Alternatives would be able to include evangelistic care centers, as long as counselors separate pregnancy counseling from evangelism sessions.

Mr. Entsminger said he's pleased with the development and hopes the same thing could happen in Florida. "We're not asking the government to pay for our religious activities," he said. "But we do want to see programs that allow for maximum participation from all pregnancy care centers, including centers committed to evangelism."

Lt. Gov. Jennings said the Florida program would aim for maximum participation. When asked if the Bush administration would have any reservations about explicitly evangelistic centers, Ms. Jennings replied: "Are you kidding? Not this administration."

Yes, apparently that pesky legal division between church and state is longer a problem. And considering how heavy the Care Net catalogue is on Biblical materials and antiabortion propaganda, what a blessing that is for Care Net's volunteer "consultants," who can continue to "be the hands and feet of Jesus."

Several years ago, a CPC in Calgary operating under the Care Net umbrella was investigated for its dishonest practices, which included fear and guilt-inducing misinformation about abortion. A young woman featured in the Canadian W-5 program's televised exposé, fooled by deceptive advertising, went to the center seeking information and advice about how to obtain an abortion. She was told that having an abortion would put her at risk of future infertility, eating disorders, and self-mutilation, in addition to leaving her guilt-ridden for life and ruining her relationship with God.

Despite Care Net's slick and shiny PR campaigns, their fundamental message hasn't changed: abortion is dangerous, God hates it, and if you have an abortion, you WILL be sorry.

A number of Care Net-affiliated centers offer an online Post-Abortion Stress Test featuring over 40 indicative "symptoms" in three categories, ranging in severity from "disappointment" and "weight gain" all the way to frankly alarming signs of possible mental instability such as "fear of having a deformed child, fear of God's punishment, feeling the presence of the aborted child." Put a checkmark next to any one of these – even the mildest and most ambiguous -- click the button labeled "Take the test," and a pop-up window informs you that "You ... may have a mild form of post-abortion stress. Call us today at 1-800-595-5753 if you would like to speak in person with someone about post-abortion syndrome."

Yeah, girl, come on down.

1
 
 

Comments

bayprairie's picture

I'm curious about how CPCs are regulated. It seems to me that they're intended to replace health care clinics that provide abortion services. Well, abortions are performed by legitimate MDs who are skilled OB/GYN specialists and they're highly regulated by the states, much much more so than similar medical professionals.

So who regulates CPCs? We just throw out tax money out to them and what guarantee do we have that (a) its being spent wisely and (b) that the people who're providing the "care" are qualified? I mean nurses have standards they must meet. Doctors have standards they must meet. What about direct patient contact types at CPCs?

Are they state licsenced? How many years must they study before they're certified? Are there state board exams the must pass and standards they must meet to provide care to their clients?

And I wonder, what kind of training do they receive?

What organizations train the CPC workers?

Do you know of any examples?


(14 February 2006 - 3:24am)
le lyons's picture
le lyons says:

I became pro-choice at the age of 18 after volunteering for a year at one of these ridiculous CPCs. In Florida, no less. Anyhow, to offer some sort of insight into my time as a "client assistant" or whatever I was at The Women's Resource Center (originally called The Crisis Pregnancy Center, but they changed the name to attract unsuspecting college students who thought they were going to Planned Parenthood or similar) I would fill out an intake form on women who came in and then take them back to a private room. We did pregnancy tests. And then, if the test came back positive we had many strategies for convincing women not to have an abortion. We had the traditional god-awful videos and pamphlets, but we also had support services - like "we'll give you clothes and diapers if you just carry that thing for 9 months and then raise it for 18 years. You'll be fine! Sure you may not have a career, or enough money for food but you are a woman and you must give birth!" I was at the University of Florida at the time, and there's a fairly good quality hospital and med school there. We had one or two doctors that partnered with us and would work with any of our "clients" that we referred to him (often setting up payment plans or whatever it took to prevent an abortion from happening). Ironically, the president of our organization was a man (as most are) and the doctors that partnered with us were men. But the worker bees were women, and I believe that many of them were well-intentioned but just misinformed about what is best for a woman and what her role should be. I certainly was. Around the time that I grew so disgusted with what we were doing that I was actually counseling women toward having abortions (there was a center for that right across the street), we were raising funds to install an ultrasound machine because, the powers-at-be figured that if a woman could just hear their "baby's" heartbeat they would not be able to terminate their pregnancy. From what I can tell on the website (http://www.yourwrc.org/) I don't think that ever materialized. Who knows though. It is definitely a very very evil movement and because I have seen it from the inside...it scares the hell out of me. We had absolutely zero regulations. And, did I mention that we also started an abstinence ed program while I was there? You wouldn't believe the curriculum...Yikes. Anyhow, the happy ending for me is that CPCs turned me vehemently pro-choice (I have been a lobbyist in Texas state politics for the pro-choice side - in fact I was there during this past session when we got slaughtered, see above posting) and that means that there is hope.


(14 February 2006 - 8:41am)
le lyons's picture
le lyons says:

The entire motivation behind the CPC I worked at was to convert everyone who walked through the doors to Christianity. I would actually say that the focus on anti-abortion priorities was more like 25% and the focus on "Did they accept Jesus as their Lord and Savior???" was more like 75%. So, I would venture to say that the whole CPC movement is mainly just another way to proselytize. And they’re doing it at the expense of women, of course. As if you all didn't already know that. It's really really repulsive. Thanks for posting this.


(14 February 2006 - 8:46am)
bayprairie's picture

In answer to my own question above I've been googling around on the internent trying to find out what I can about training at Crisis Pregnancy Centers. I found this interesting tid-bit that I'll share what you here. This gentleman, who's site I've stumbled across, seems to be well respected in his field, and the list of clients he mentions contains familiar organizational names.

I can't say one way or another what this represents, but I'll put up a few cites, a link to the page and let the reader examine.

ULTRASOUND: FOR SOME CPC CLIENTS, IT’S NOT ENOUGH

Friday night I spoke to a gathering of pro-life crisis pregnancy center directors (and staff) in Naples, Florida. One of my points was this: Although ultrasound is a wonderful tool for reaching abortion-minded women, sometimes it’s not enough. Stronger, more provocative images may be needed (with the client’s consent, of course) if we are to save lives. I no sooner made that point when this appeared in yesterday’s New York Times

:::snip:::

Admittedly, the use of abortion pictures by pro-life pregnancy centers is a controversial subject. So, let me be clear about two points: First, I’m not claiming that graphic images work in every case. Sometimes a client is so hardened that we simply cannot reach her. Second, I don’t think for a moment that every woman visiting a CPC needs to view these pictures. However, it doesn’t follow from this that CPCs should never offer them. Sometimes abortion pictures do what ultrasound cannot: reawaken a client’s moral intuitions.

As former CareNet center director Suzanne Genit points out, there are five types of abortion-minded clients:

  • Type #1: Responds to loving support, chooses life.
  • Type #2: Responds to information on fetal development—chooses life
  • Type #3: Responds to descriptions of abortion techniques—chooses life
  • Type #4: Remains unmoved by love, facts/information, and verbal descriptions of abortion techniques, but responds to graphic abortion videos—chooses life.
  • Type #5: Hardens her heart to all information—chooses abortion.


(14 February 2006 - 12:58pm)
artemisia's picture
artemisia says:

these other passages from the same source:

If client #4 is not more horrified of abortion than she is terrified of her own crisis pregnancy, her baby will die. Given what’s at stake, it’s not enough for her to simply imagine this horror.

Nationally, pro-lifers have struggled for years to reach African-American women, a group that represents 12% of the population but has 35% of all abortions. You would think that if anyone would take offense at graphic pictures, it would be these women.

That’s not the case. According to a study conducted by the Center for Business and Economic Research at the University of Dayton (OH) and commissioned by Dayton Right to Life, graphic abortion pictures resonate powerfully with black women.


(14 February 2006 - 2:54pm)

store

Not Your Emininent Domain!

Buy stuff here.

» Pregnant? Need help? Call 1-800-PROPAGANDA