16 January 2006 - 8:42pm
That was then. That's all in the past. (On elusive dreams, contentless character and being taken for a bus ride)
I cannot help but feel that the Democratic Party no longer represents me, or the things I consider important. The fix seems to be in: push the Democratic Party ever rightward, towards social conservatism. And I wonder at the direction both parties are taking this country.
When I read what Mike said...
There's been a lot of talk about how the progressive netroots is left twisting in the wind. Why do the establishment Democrats ignore our pearls of wisdom, and our genius solons? Here's why: they have no incentive whatsoever to do so–and it's not simply that the netroots aren't like the rest of America. Why would the Democratic establishment do this to the loyal netroots?
Because we have the attention span of gnats, and are unwilling to punish Democrats. First, the attention span. Remember when Kos boldly pronounced that the netroots were going to boldly take back the party? 'Everyone' was raring to go, and then... nothing. Instead, we got a love affair with Rahm Emanuel's conservative and anti-abortion Democrats, even though our base is disproportionately pro-choice women
...all I can say is "right on."
And when Dadahead asks...
How different would the Democratic Party look if it were actively trying, 1919 Black Sox style, to throw everything to the GOP? I'm not saying that they are doing that; I'm just asking what the difference would be.
...I find I have to ponder that a bit, because it seems like the Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee did everything right ... to play into the Republican game plan and get Alito confirmed without even framing him as anything but the mainstream guy he's not.
And I'm not sure what John means when he says...
Only an idiot thinks Bush won the election because "much of the American public" supported anything in his platform. He won by default. People couldn't stand him, they didn't want him back as president, but the Democrats presented the voters with an even worse choice. And when it's a choice between two evils, while Mae West may pick the one she hasn't tried, the American people prefer the lesser of the two. Any Democrat who thinks Bush won, and we lost, because he had some kind of mandate is a fool.
This is just that much more evidence of why there needs to be a major blood-letting in the Democratic party, and soon. Heads need to roll. ROLL. People need to lose their jobs, en masse. After 2000, no one took responsibility. After 2004, no one took responsibility. And now it's happening again. Our wonderful party leaders are sitting back and scratching their heads wondering why the country isn't simply running into our arms while they sit back and do nothing to earn the country's respect and loyalty.
There needs to be a major revolution in the Democratic party. Heads need to roll, and soon.
...I tend to agree. (I'd like to see a bloodletting of the wingnuts from the Republican Party, too, but they're the governing party -- no sense hoping for the ruling elite to reform themselves.
And when a long-time Kosnik writes...
I hear there is a lot of bitching and complaining on Daily Kos today. I hear some think we should abandon the Democratic Party.
If it is some Kossacks desire to do so, fine. It is (or used to be) free country, and as such, anyone can do what they wish.
I just have one request.
Get the fuck off this site and never ever come back.
...I can only wonder at how progressive values have gotten such a bad name from the so-called "netroots."
And when, today, Kos writes...
We are a reaction to the politics of personal destruction pioneered by the right's Clinton-hating brigades, the vile and corrosive rhetoric of Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, and company, and the politics of demonization which the Right practices against blacks, immigrants, and gays.
But when someone on the left fights back, it's the end of the fucking world.
I understand that it was easier for right-wing hacks to ply their trash when liberals unilaterally disarmed and took it with nary a peep. I understand they pine for those days when the best we could offer in rebuttal was Alan Colmes.
But they created the environment we now play in. They wanted a "culture war", an ideological fight, a partisan rumble in which only one side brought guns to the game. Those days are over.
They don't like it, they only have themselves to blame.
...I can only wonder what "culture war" he's talking about, since all he's done for the past year is argue how Democrats should surrender and retreat on the "culture wars" and talk up up candidates who are pro-war and pro-government ownership of women's bodies.
And of course when the press plays the right-wing game, there's little chance for meaningful public discourse.
Four decades ago, the Democrats fought the right fight. Many would argue that much of the backlash the Democrats have experienced in the South is a direct result of that fight to establish the rights of "Negroes" to vote, to attend school, even to eat at lunch counters. The fight for some semblance of justice was won, but the Democrats since then lost seats in Congress. And many would argue that the Democratic Party we saw in the Alito hearings was nothing like the party that fought for social justice. Now they seem cowed and all too easily baited by the Republicans. Now they seem to want nothing more than to be more like the Republicans.
...And as I look at the post-hearings spin from Democratic leaders, and post-hearings silence from so many so-called "progressive" bloggers, I ponder the question:
What kind of Democratic Party would greet Dr. King today?
When it comes to social values, the parties offer up conservative and more conservative. That's no choice. The Republicans and their culture of corruption are on the ropes, but the Democrats are behaving like they're the losers, and push forward ever-more-conservative candidates for public office. And in this post-Katrina nation wrestling with a foolhardy war and budget and trade deficits racing out of control, the window for progressive change is closing out of sheer neglect.
You have a dream? That and $2.50 will get you a cup of coffee. Now get to the back of the bus.
Similar entries
store
Buy stuff here.





















Comments
and fuck Delaware Dem. I have to say that I've discovered a wealth of really good blogs I'd been missing now that the little hack martinet Kos and his bully boys "invited" me off the site. I'd wasted too much time there.
Any change that comes will be born locally and from small pockets of resistance. Ambitious ward heelers like Kos, DH, Armando and Delaware Dem care only about the talking points they're fed, and furthering a center-right agenda wearing a bunch of ribbons in its chest. Women, gays, the poor and minorities aren't on their radar, or on the radars of their masters Reid, Schumer and Emmanuel.
The part I liked the most about Gore's speech was keeping free the Internet. Which is a far cry from what the "A" List bloggers are promoting. They are pushing for ..."justice on the internets"... that is "Just Us" on the internet... all others shut the fuck up... and give them your money. Their intimidation and trolling techniques are worthy of a seat at Rove's table.
I give you that ... this so called "A List" blogger left wing messaging machine is not giving up "their fight" to push the party to the far right sitting down. Now, Donnie Fowler equates the burning liberalism of Gore's speech is on the same platform as Eric Massa, anti choice Republican (d) ...if it weren't so pathetic I'd laugh. And as always... for good measure... they hobo themselves onto Howard Dean's boxcar ... as if that some how hides that their real intent and their rightward push.
truly gagworthy. That is a selling job, for certain, from Donnie Fowler.
Eric Massa in NY-29 is nothing to do with Gore and his speeches.
Massa-29 endorsed by another former non Democrat (Clark) and endorsed by Gene Taylor of MS, a pro life all star in Democrats for Life and beloved by the Christian Coalition, Massa is a former Republican, a 'Fighting Dem" and no doubt yet another Rahm recruit.
Call them "Rahm Recruits" and be done with it. Biz Wing, War Wing Anti Woman Wing.
Senator Shelby of Alabama should come back home, he'd fit right in, again.
"Four decades ago, the Democrats fought the right fight."
Four decades ago, the Democratic Party in my home state was ardently committed to the strategy of "massive resistance" to desegregation. The Freedom Movement was fighting against the established Democrat power structure; a Democrat mayor fought for bus segregation tooth and nail, a Democrat governor proclaimed "segregation now, segregation tomorrow, and segregation forever," and a Democrat police commissioner turned firehoses and attack dogs on unarmed children. Over in Mississippi (home of Jim Eastland) and Georgia (home of Richard Russell) and Arkansas (home of Orval Faubus) the situation wasn't much different.
"What kind of Democratic Party would greet Dr. King today?"
I find it hard to imagine how the Democratic Party of today could manage to displease Dr. King more than it did at the time, given that at the time it was held in a stranglehold by his cruelest and most powerful enemies.
...is which, back then, was the real Democratic Party? Because pushing for desegregation was the national Democratic leadership.
Today would there be any national Democratic leadership pushing for anyone's rights? Or would they go along to get along? Would they strike magnificent poses, then knuckle under once the tv lights are turned off?
Would schools be desegregated? Would the Voting Rights Act happen?
I find these things hard to reconcile with the kinder and gentler Republicans to which the national Democratic Party seems to aspire.