Since 2004, Media Girl has been an online community by and for women (and men, too) to take on media, politics and culture. Register and join the discussion!
When rage burns to cinders
I suppose that, as a political blogger, I should be more engaged these days. Mid-term elections are on. The right wing is eager to force women into pregnancy. Republicans are dealing with internal battles their innate racism and free-trade ideology. The ice caps are melting away. And Bush is, well, still in power, which is bad news for the world.
I suppose that we all burn out at some point. Frankly, I find it hard to engage with the so-called liberal blogozoid these days. It's getting to be like the right-wing echosphere, colored by party-first dogmatists and regressive apologists with world views defined by growing up under Reagan and political styles more reminiscent of Tammany Hall than city hall. Manufacturing consent is a phrase that resonates with me now.
I suppose it's to be expected, what with elections this year and all that.
But really, it's disgusting. The real agents of change in this country are cultural and technological. Politically, we're lost in a political atmosphere reminiscent of the 1850s. 1850 is where the Republicans want to take this country, and the Democrats play along by accommodating, appeasing and recruiting bigoted, misogynist and xenophobic twits and goons who are right along with the minus-150-years agenda.
Call me jaded, but I don't believe one whit that jackasses and fucktards who were attacking pro-choice progressives as "single-issue voters" now suddenly have gotten religion and actually back gender equality and reproductive rights. I don't believe that anyone who endorsed Casey or Kaine or any of the plethora of forced-pregnancy advocates is truly a friend of women's autonomy. They say it's "the big tent."
I say "pro-choice" already is the big tent. It's the forced-pregnancy advocates who have the litmus tests.
I believe the majority of people in this country are basically progressive at heart. They want to do good by people. They believe everyone should get a fair shake. They believe that equality is part of what this country was founded on.
Progressive is more than a word, and if people are going to invoke it, they should walk the talk. That's called "integrity." I hear tell that people like that sort of thing.
That's all.
More like this
- Because nothing raises money like bashing the "competition"
- Can a big tent stand without any tent poles?
- Pro-choice already is the "big tent" (duh!)
- That was then. That's all in the past. (On elusive dreams, contentless character and being taken for a bus ride)
- So who's really to blame for the Roberts-Scalito court?


Comments
burning rage
Amen
This is his job
Someone put him up to bash Naral, now he is being told to bash Pelosi... my guess is that Rahm wants the job, or they will give it to only an anti choice Dem to lock out the pro choice debate from the Dem Party forever. He may not be getting cash but he is getting "entrance" into the political "market" books, radio, tv and access to the powers that be.
House Speaker Rahm
Emanuel seriously wants to be House Speaker. And if his prowar & antichoice sockpuppets make a decent showing in the general, he'll get it, too.
---------------------
“Dr Gannon told me I must be fed. …I was held down by five people…Gannon pushed the tube up left nostril…It hurts nose and throat very much and makes nose bleed freely…Operation leaves one very sick.�
~Lucy Burns i
we're not thrilled with rahm
we're not enamored with the left blogistan either, and we've just concluded reading and reviewing a wicked big slice of it. rahm's screwed the ca-11 primary and he may have lost the il-06 in the general, and chuck created casey in pa.
the party goosesteppers are a serious pain in the ass.
if the drupal goddess has time on her hands, i'm curious.