» BlogHer-nonymous

31 July 2006 - 5:54pm

BlogHer-nonymous

media girl's picture

According to Pew (link is pdf), more than half of all bloggers blog anonymously or under a pseudonym. So I wonder if everyone was lying, coming out naked or drawn from a self-selectively-skewed sampling, because I was the only pseudononymous blogger I met at the BlogHer conference.

"So what's your blog?" was the opening refrain to many conversations. Multiple choise choice [duh!]: (a) "Oh, I blogged more in the past, but not much lately, but I'm thinking of getting active again" (which is true); (b) "Mrs. Borden's Parole" (which is false); (c) "I don't want to say, I'm too embarrassed" (which is true); (d) "If I told you, I'd have to kill you" (which is false b/c I'd just kill myself)....

This may not be a fair generalization, but it seemed like a mommyblogger's conference. At least it seemed like I was meeting a lot of mommies (who presumably were bloggers, or else why would they be there?).

A lot of the sessions were interesting. From what I read of the first conference, I guess I was expecting more interaction within the room, but it seemed like most of the presentations were just that -- presentations, and while they all had Q&A, few of them were room-wide discussions, and that's too bad. There were a lot of really interesting women there, but it seemed like I heard mostly just panelists and presenters.

Now maybe I'm just too burnt out on politics, but I think the most boring session was the politics session. At first the room wasn't even that crowded, but people started to come in after it started. It was kind of unique, with one woman (whose name has escaped me) being kind of the Sally Jessie Raphael, walking around the room with the microphone, getting questions, having a panelist answer, and then opining herself.

I don't know. The whole political thing bores me these days -- which was kind-of addressed, at least the burn-out "dark night" kind of angle. Me, I'm just bored with stupidity. And so I guess I was hoping that we'd have some sharp commentary on the political scene. Maybe I just slept through it. It just seemed like this session was the opposite of what I'd expected, because while the panelists for the most part did not engage each other in debate, it almost had this kind of kumbayah feeling, like, Isn't it just so cool we're all blogging about politics (but let's not really get into it).

It was kind of fun seeing Lindsay Beyerstein up there, and for a conserative, Ann Althouse was reasonably non-offensive -- at least her statements were mostly devoid of party-line jingoism.

(I can already hear the protests about my admittedly over-generalized characterizations of that session and the people. Well, share it. Maybe we can have the exchanges that did not happen there.)

I also liked hearing Jarah of Fresno Famous, who was funny talking about how odd her town is. And hearing about Lindsay's harrowing encounter with the gubmint post-Katrina, and a soldier's (?) threat of "disappearing" her and her friends when they trespassed onto prison grounds where an unofficial morgue was supposedly kept.

The room was overwhelmingly liberal in the I'm-skeptical-of-anything-the-government-does kind of way (which used to be a conservative trait before conservatives embraced fascist values), so at least I didn't feel out of place.

Just bored.

But the conference itself wasn't boring. Arianna Huffington and Grace Davis were almost more political in their closing keynote. Arianna's story about losing her social circle of friends when she dropped conservatism and embraced liberal values was interesting. As someone whose politics haven't changed much in xx years (while the parties have raced righward), I'd never thought about losing all of one's friends just for dropping GOP gang colors.

Still, looking back I can see why the majority of bloggers who blog anonymously or under a pseudonym don't seek out an event like this. In many ways, it was like going back to high school, with clicques and -- how do you spell what sounds like "soashiz"? and then the rest of us.

Biggest hoot: Seeing a blogger named Liz Henry living it loud (to the extent that she is the subject of not one but two of the more outlandish appearances in the Flickr BlogHer photos [and that's 'nuff said]).

Biggest disappointment: Missing Lauren, formerly of Feministe, who's now blogging under a male name and suddenly garnering all sorts of respect. Go figure, huh?

1
 
 
About author
User picture

media girl also blogs at other places.

Comments

Sour Duck's picture
Sour Duck says:

Damn, I was in the same session as you - the political blogging one. Didn't spot you although I certainly looked around the room. I was sitting right next to Liza Sabater (blogs: Culture Kitchen and Daily Gotham), who got up to speak several times...

Well. And now for feedback on your post.

I think you're quite right in that mommyblogging was the dominant vibe. From the speakers to the panels to the sponsorship money - it all seemed to assume that women meant "heterosexual, married mothers".

Secondly, I almost feel sorry for people who had Blogher 2006 as their first experience of Blogher. While I'm sure most people valued meeting people, etc., the sponsorship presence was oppressive and in-your-face.

The conference was also more mainstream this year, less political and more vanilla. I think this has to do with the newly unveiled BlogHer Ad Network and glut of sponsors.

I found the closing panel on Day Two an absolute bore and not only that, but a toe-curling love-in between the panelists. Plus Mena Trott used it to plug Six Apart and Vox.

- Sour Duck


(1 August 2006 - 12:33am)
media girl's picture

There were a lot of mommiebloggers because, well, there are a lot of mommie-bloggers! If the dominant age group in blogging is under 40, it only makes sense that many, if not most, of the women would be mothers.

I was just writing about my own sense of not being a part of the group. Flashing back to high school, you know? After a glass of wine, I was thinking about that at the airport, which is where I wrote this post.

But really, what happened to political blogging? Are we all supposed to be cowed by the astroturfed netroots? Are we all supposed to just be dittoheads?

Political blogging is about getting out there and expressing one's own beliefs and values, and bucking the manufactured consent we get from the mainstream media and, now, from some "A-list bloggers." And it's especially true when it comes to women bloggers, where the pressure to be nice and not buck the Democratic Party line on reproductive rights or try to "distract" from what the men consider "important shit" seems to be increasing.

I didn't see that. I guess I'd been hoping for a more spirited discussion led by these eloquent women. Maybe they were as burned out by all the crap as I am. I'd hoped to get inspired and come away re-energized, but instead I found my own mood reflected back at me.


(5 August 2006 - 9:09am)
H.A..Page's picture
H.A..Page says:

This is the best write-up I've read on BlogHer. And, yes, the attendees and the personality of the event is not the fault of the sponsors, but the mommy blogs constitute an entirely different genre.

I started my site with a .com name from when my kids were little. They are no longer small and my interests are way beyond mothering but the mommy bloggers are a social entity with commentary closer to a dog's marking territory than anything full of erudite information...(don't mean that in a snarky way).

After reading your write up (compared to Jill's (from Business of Life) from last year), I'm glad I was too busy to go.


(9 August 2006 - 4:26pm)
media girl's picture

I enjoyed myself, but was disappointed in the political session. At least it was free of punditry.


(9 August 2006 - 7:28pm)

store

Not Your Emininent Domain!

Buy stuff here.

» BlogHer-nonymous