» GOP loses & the lesson of the lemmings

8 November 2006 - 9:52am

GOP loses & the lesson of the lemmings

Matsu's picture

The Republicans have a reputation for being disciplined and that reputation extends to the Republicans members of the House and Senate. The GOP Congressional members move largely in formation. Today that formation resembles a bunch of lemmings moving to perdition.

After a huge layoff, if I still had my job, but many of my colleagues did not, irrespective of the industry, when I got to my desk the next day, I would have to take a long and hard look at my own survivability. I would close the door and sit down and rethink what career issues were at stake for me. If I was a GOP member of Congress (or a Dem, too) I would take a long, hard, and frank look at myself and wonder if I should walk in lock step with anyone, except for those who determine whether or not I keep my job. I would look at those who no longer around and take a lesson.

Did the voters who put me in office put me there to be a GOP rubber stamp? I might have been swept in by a GOP tide and my State or District may have gone for George W. Bush, but did they want we to be one of the lemmings? When does discipline begin to become corrosive?

The Democrats are very far right of where they were a generation ago. It isn't that the country has suddenly shifted to "liberal" values. No. Then I look at Lincoln Chaffee, and he's out. It's not about the politics. It's about the party. It's about the way that Congress isn't doing its job. It is no longer behaving like one of the branches of government.

If this were a corporation, it would be equivalent to terminating an employee who is content to just sit around and sign off on everything without adding value. We've seen it in industry where the Board of Directors or the top management team kowtows to the boss. The word in my parent's generations for this was "being a yes man."

I would realize on the morning after that there is a way to disagree while still being loyal. I would recognize that the electorate (beyond the base) had come out to register their displeasure with those who did not demonstrate that they had a bit of a spine. I would understand that George W. Bush is a lame duck. I would know that "staying the course" has been repudiated at the polls, although I would know there are those who will continue to advocate it until the bitter end in November, 2008.

The vote on November 7, 2006, was in part a message to Congress that ideology was not as important as getting to work. If I were a Senator or Representative, I would know that a wakeup call had been sent out for us to get off our collective duffs and do the job we were getting perks and pay to perform.

I would know that George W. Bush and his inner circle are marching into history, but that my own career might span a number of terms well beyond that.

At one point coat tails can turn into anchors and loyalty can backfire if it appears I am not thinking for myself and not listening to the electorate.

I would know that in two, four, or six years I would be measured by what I had done and not purely on loyalty to the White House. The clock would be ticking and it would be the first day of the rest of my career.

0

Comments

Robyn's picture
Robyn says:

Did anyone else notice President Bush's comment when congradulating the democracts then telling Nancy Pelosi that he had some Republican decorators that would help her pick out curtains for her new offices!! I can't believe that he is getting away with a chauvanistic comment like that. if the new speaker of the house had been a man that comment would never have been spoken! it just goes to show he has no respect for women in congress unless the women are serving him coffee or picking up after him like Nancy will do with IraQ!!!


(8 November 2006 - 3:28pm)
pennywit's picture
pennywit says:

Did anyone else notice President Bush's comment when congradulating the democracts then telling Nancy Pelosi that he had some Republican decorators that would help her pick out curtains for her new offices!! I can't believe that he is getting away with a chauvanistic comment like that. if the new speaker of the house had been a man that comment would never have been spoken!

I disagree with your assessment. "Already measuring the office for new drapes" is a cliche for "moving into the new office before the election is won." And in general "new drapes" is the cliche act that a politician takes when moving into a new office, a visible symbol that somebody new is moving in.

That said, perhaps Bush could provide a fumigator for former Rep. Foley's offices ...

--|PW|--


(10 November 2006 - 8:55am)
Matsu's picture
Matsu says:

I wrote this post before Rumsfeld got sacked. It sort of remind me of the guy who accidently sets fire to his neighbor's house and then promises to make amends by shooting his dog.


(10 November 2006 - 12:04pm)
pennywit's picture
pennywit says:

Reminded me of Ol' Yeller, actually.

--|PW|--


(10 November 2006 - 3:20pm)
Matsu's picture
Matsu says:

Mark Shields on the News Hour last night said that you don't take the punching bag out of the gym.

And our new Defense Secretary. Doesn't he bear a strong resemblance to the CIA man in "Apocalypse Now" who says "terminate with extreme prejudice."


(11 November 2006 - 6:05am)

store

Not Your Emininent Domain!

Buy stuff here.

» GOP loses & the lesson of the lemmings