Letting state governments play Big Brother is not a very compelling libertarian view, is it? Government is government when it comes to civil rights.

Dr. Ron Paul is firmly opposed to abortion, and he would like to see Roe v Wade overturned. Let me be clear: He also does not support a federal ban on abortion.

This is the constitutionally correct position. The Constitution does not allow for the Federal government to play a role in the realm of abortion, believing this to be a States' rights issue.

Thus, both sides win.

What loony logic that is. State-run breeding agencies are okay? That's how "both sides win"?

Here's the real "both sides win" view, Jason: the pregnant woman decides for herself. After all, it's her body, not the government's.

And Jason, if you or Ron Paul are against abortion, then don't have one.