pennywit's picture
pennywit says:

How is that not Patriarchy codified?

The question here, I think, is not whether breast-fondling is subject to regulation, but whether it is suject to the same regulation as similar transactions.

If you give this particular transaction special status, making it immune to, for example, rules against price-gouging and fraud, then you're creating a special status for transactions involving the fondling women's breasts. Is that what you're after here?

--|PW|--


(25 September 2006 - 6:16pm)

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <img> <em> <i> <strong> <b> <u> <s> <small> <ul> <ol> <li> <blockquote> <s> <h2> <h3> <h4> <hr> <acronym> <br> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Be not a spam bot!
4 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

store

Not Your Emininent Domain!

Buy stuff here.