» While CNN puts on a show that pretends to be a debate....

15 November 2007 - 11:46pm

While CNN puts on a show that pretends to be a debate....

media girl's picture

...the actual candidates try to get a word in edge-wise. Why did Wolf Blitzer feel he had to interrupt every answer? It's like only the questions mattered to CNN. They didn't care about the answers.

And what was with that last question about diamonds or pearls?

This wasn't a debate -- it was a group interview, CNN style. Meaning no questions of substance -- such as, "What is your healthcare plan?" And certainly no time for any answers of substance.

This was CNN trying to assert its alpha dog status over the politicians. All with the highest ethical standards, don't you know. (I.e., selling commercials.)

The post-debate show was like watching a post-game wrap-up. David Gergen, James Carville and company used just about every sports metaphor in the book. "Hillary Clinton was rested and ready."

What are they? Horses?

Is it any wonder we turn to the internet for real news? CNN's "debate" show was a joke. How sad for our country.

5
About author
User picture

media girl also blogs at other places.

Comments

OleBlue's picture
OleBlue says:

It is not an election but a popularity contest


(27 November 2007 - 7:57pm)
jack sheppard's picture

Mediagirl ploughs no lonely furrow in looking askance at WOlf Blitzer. If Mr Blitzer offered deference towards professional excellence to match the deference he shows towards Reublican politicians (and, of course, Dick Cheney's missus as author of children's history books), he may move off the list of television irritants. Long shot, but theoretically possible.
Politicians are transient, and of lesser calibre than the interviewer (merely riff-raff), but Wolfie is forever. That's a status of longevity he shares with diamonds, athlete's foot and the common cold. An ego that may have to be entombed in a zeppelin hangar when he is gathered to his fathers sadly undermines his value as a television interviewer. In this, he is a sorry contrast to the late Ed Murrow, whose wit and sensitive antennae told him how intrusive the question-asker should be. Despite his notions of omnipotence, Blitzer is as much a victim of the tyranny of the clock as what he would describe as lesser mortals. Much has to be crammed with the boundaries of Late Edition and wherever else he yabbers on television. So it's all pell-mell, with Democrats more likely to be chopped off in mid-sentence than the inheritors of Richar Nixon's Repblican grandeur. A great British journalist, the late Hugo Young of The Guardian, wrote that no politican leader should stay in office more than six years. Television pundits and moderators may also have their limitations of effective distance run. And the white-bearded ersatz sage of Late Edition may already have swooshed past the effectiveness finishing line.


(28 November 2007 - 9:15pm)

store

Not Your Emininent Domain!

Buy stuff here.

» While CNN puts on a show that pretends to be a debate....