» More corruption revealed among conservative columnists

16 December 2005 - 11:48pm

More corruption revealed among conservative columnists

media girl's picture

Sometimes you gotta wonder at the hubris exhibited by the conservatives passing around, and taking, money in Washington like New Year's confetti. The latest:

The scholar, Doug Bandow, who wrote a column for the Copley News Service in addition to serving as a Cato fellow, acknowledged to executives at the organization that he had taken money from Mr. Abramoff after he was confronted about the payments by a reporter from BusinessWeek Online.

"He acknowledges he made a lapse in judgment," said Jamie Dettmer, director of communications at Cato. "There's a lot of sadness here."

So sad that he got caught. This, dear readers, is what we call "accountability." A conservative gets caught doing something bad, and gets sad, so sad.

The revelation caps a year of disclosures about partisan payments to seemingly independent writers, including Armstrong Williams, the conservative columnist and television host, who received payments from the federal Education Department at a time when he was promoting the Bush administration's education policies in his columns. The administration has been under mounting pressure to become more transparent in its communications after accounts that it paid for and printed articles in Iraqi periodicals as part of its overseas propaganda effort.

Very well practiced at this, these conservatives. Image is everything, after all.

Mr. Bandow did not take government money, but the source of his payments - around $2,000 an article - is no less controversial. His sometime sponsor, Mr. Abramoff, is at the center of a far-reaching criminal corruption investigation involving several members of Congress, with prosecutors examining whether he sought to bribe lawmakers in exchange for legislative help.

Funny how all these things seem to start to make sense if you just follow the money.

But Bandow has nothing on Peter Ferrara, whose arrogance knows no sadness when caught. In fact, he's happy in his hubris.

A second scholar, Peter Ferrara, of the Institute for Policy Innovation, acknowledged in the same BusinessWeek Online piece that he had also taken money from Mr. Abramoff in exchange for writing certain opinion articles. But Mr. Ferrara did not apologize for doing so. "I do that all the time," Mr. Ferrara was quoted as saying.

All the time. Well, at least now we'll all know that when we read him, it's just advertising copy.

0
 
 
About author
User picture

media girl also blogs at other places.

Comments

AndiF's picture
AndiF says:

If a person believes that capitalism is the ultimate good and that individuals who make the most money in a capitalist society do so because they deserve that good, then this behavior is both logical and worthy. The difference between Bandow and Ferrara is that Bandow has failed to be a true believer.


(17 December 2005 - 6:39am)
Tom Giovanetti's picture

The article in BusinessWeek that started this whole thing, upon which all subsequent articles and Paul Krugman's commentary are based, omitted important statements and resulted in a complete misrepresentation. All subsequent who have written on this topic are guilty of passing on misrepresentation without bothering to fact-check. You can view IPI's and Ferrara's statements at www.ipi.org


(19 December 2005 - 9:01pm)
media girl's picture

Did they not take money to write about certain things?


(19 December 2005 - 10:11pm)

store

Not Your Emininent Domain!

Buy stuff here.

» More corruption revealed among conservative columnists