» Hillary wraps herself in the flag

5 December 2005 - 8:06pm

Hillary wraps herself in the flag

media girl's picture

No, she hasn't gone and backed the Flag Desecration Amendment. No, Hillary Clinton wants to have her cake and eat it, too, so she's backing a federal law to ban flag desecration.

Because, you know, there's like a huge rash of flag burning happening in America, right? You see it every day, don't you? Your neighbor does it! Your school teacher does it! The fireman down the block does it! Kids studying French in middle school do it! John Kerry does it every day over his morning coffee before going to the office!

Her support of [Utah Senator Bob] Bennett's bill follows her position in Congress last summer, when a constitutional ban on flag-burning was debated. Clinton said then she didn't support a constitutional ban, but did support federal legislation making it a crime to desecrate the flag.

In her public statements, she has compared the act of flag-burning to burning a cross, which can be considered a violation of federal civil rights law.

Oh -- but not a constitutional ban! I guess that's supposed to appease freedom-lovers. I can hear it now: "I voted for the flag desecration law before I voted against the amendment." You laugh. But I predict you'll see something like that when she runs for president.

The Bennett-sponsored measure outlaws a protester intimidating any person by burning the flag, lighting someone else's flag, or desecrating the flag on federal property.

I suspect this law could backfire on the wingnuts. After all, what's more desecrating than:

  • Putting a flag sticker on your car bumper. (Tailpipe exhaust and road grime are not sacred.)
  • Flying a flag in the rain or snow. (That's against the rules.)
  • Flying the flag at night in the dark. (Also against the rules. Come on, jerky boys! Don't you remember what you learned in scouting?)
  • Sweating in an American flag t-shirt. (Pit stains could count as desecration, I think.)
  • Wearing a flag on your underwear. (Skid marks are definitely desecration in my book.)

Oh, and you bikers? Better remove that flag from your jackets or The Man is gonna getcha! Football teams? Don't play any games on Federal property. Grass stains don't go with red, white and blue.

Also facing charges would be our armed forces, who properly dispose of a worn flag by burning it.

Then of course there's the United States Constitution, which will be cut at its most fundamental self-evident right -- freedom of speech -- in order to provide cheap pseudo-patriotic photo-ops for "public servants."

But political opportunists won't let practicalities or principles get in the way of a good pose and cheap rhetoric.

0
About author
User picture

media girl also blogs at other places.

Comments

Chris's picture
Chris says:

Well put. I completely agree. Hillary couldn't care about traditional liberal values if she supports this. Down with Hillary!


(6 December 2005 - 1:44pm)
sven's picture
sven says:

i think you are being a bit naive. hillary has no need to pander to the left. the few people who are pissed at hillary for supporting this amendment are sufficiently outraged by bush that they'll vote for her one way or another. in the end, would you rather have her be more electable in a general election or keep a couple of liberal intellectuals content?


(6 December 2005 - 2:13pm)
media girl's picture

...if you think a wishy washy Hillary is going to compel undecided voters to get out to the polls.


(6 December 2005 - 5:23pm)
Nonsense's picture
Nonsense says:

I don't think she's electable now. I don't see how pandering to the rightwing is going to make her any more electable come 08.


(6 December 2005 - 5:43pm)
aahpat's picture
aahpat says:

It is hard to desecrate something that is NOT a religious symbol. Silly people.

The flag is a symbol that represents the values codified in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Destroying the right to free political expression and speech in order to protect the symbol of free speech is as contradictory and asinine as any conservative idea that I have ever heard.

My art and rant about Hillary and the flag subject is here.

The big veteran's groups thinks Hillary is just conning them. Both she and they know that a flag protection bill will never cut constitutional muster. A constitutional amendment is required, at a minimum. And that may never be written in a constitutional way.


(6 December 2005 - 6:23pm)
gballsout's picture
gballsout says:

then it is worthless as a protest. If it doesn't upset people or draw attention to the cause, it will gather no new news. Flag burning is a way for protestors to create a non-destructive (in a *real* way) notice that they are unhappy with the status quo.

www.manicexpressions.net

www.bitchingandmoaning.org


(24 December 2005 - 9:13am)
Stupid Country's picture

Flag desecration is legal and it still pisses people off like almost nothing else. It is very effective political speech. I make a regular point of it.


(4 January 2006 - 10:14pm)

store

Not Your Emininent Domain!

Buy stuff here.

» Hillary wraps herself in the flag