In Wisconsin, sex-free colleges? Or more pregnant students?

Comments

4 comments posted
what the hell?

and when did we travel back in time to the 1950s??

this is ridiculous.

and i thought we'd only have to really worry about our repro rights being screwed via the potential overturning of roe....

ferdette's picture
Posted by ferdette on 1 August 2005 - 1:16am
Not at all

Pharmacists playing doctor....Eliminating sex ed from high schools....Prevening even married women from getting birth control....This isn't about abortion, it's about controlling women. And that is just misogyny, no matter how self-righteous the intention.

media girl's picture
Posted by media girl on 1 August 2005 - 9:31am
What if we did the same about religion????

My proposed bill prohibits people from speaking about or engaging in any form of religion. The bill is based on the belief that "discussing religion leads to fuzzy thinking and intolerance."

Matsu's picture
Posted by Matsu on 1 August 2005 - 10:10am
they have to control women's sexuality...

to maintain the patriarchy, which supports the class structure that makes politicians and coporate elitists rich from other people's work.

This has always been about controlling women, not about babies. They don't give a shit about anyone once they're born.

Morgaine-ism© #8

"A Woman's Sexual and Reproductive Autonomy is Sacred and Absolute."

Morgaine Swann's picture
Posted by Morgaine Swann on 2 August 2005 - 3:57am