» My own blasphemy

19 April 2005 - 6:23pm

My own blasphemy

media girl's picture

[Warning: Religious Content Advisory. Those easily offended by blasphemous remarks about the Pope and the Catholic Church should not read this, because you'll just be offended, and I don't want to ruin anyone's day.]

Ding dong! The presence of perfection has been restored to the surface of the Earth. Don't we all feel better now? We have a Pope whose strong resume includes political activity at a very young age (in the Hitler Youth), military service (as an anti-aircraft gunner) and strong anti-Communist credentials. Some will say that all that is in the past and he transcended to a higher state of righteousness that permits him to see Truth so clearly that all of us who do not bow to his patriarchy are doomed to hell and damnation. This is supposed to be reassuring?

There's lots of excitement in the media and on the blogs about the new Pope. No doubt the news programmers are fretting that the Conclave didn't last longer. Now they can't milk a few more days of "the news is that there's no news" coverage out of the Vatican. Lord knows they don't want to have to be covering those unsexy stories like Iraq or the Ivory Coast or Darfur, or how the radical conservatives are undermining the Constitution as being against Jesus. No, they'll go back to their baboon shows, maybe try to revive interest in the Michael Jackson trial.

But let's talk about the Pope. Some people have expressed praise or alarm that this Pope longs for the good old days, back when those not under the authority of the Holy Roman Empire were considered heathens. It's true, he's all for treating women as breeding slaves, with no birth control. It's true, he believes that a penis is required for priesthood. It's true, he believes every sperm is sacred. It's true that he does not respect other faiths like John Paul II seemed to. But then, what else is new from the modern incarnation of the Holy Roman Emperor? What else could we expect from 2000-year-old thinking?

Traditionalists claim that this is exactly what we need: "traditional values."

I would just like to point out that 2000 years ago, slavery was not only accepted, it was considered a kindness. 2000 years ago, women were treated as property, to be abused, imprisoned, executed at the discretion of men. 2000 years ago, there was no concept of freedom as we know it today. Rulers ruled by divine right -- or were considered divine in and of themselves. (That's a good gig, something the Romans may have picked up from the Egyptian Pharaohs.)

Of course, we should not forget that the Roman Catholic Church is intended to celebrate Jesus Christ, who spoke of peace and love and taught by example. In celebrating and advancing the honoring of Him, previous Popes have donned armor, climbed onto horses and led armies on conquests, spreading the True Faith at the point of sword and pike and arrow. Fortunately, today we already have a self-appointed hand of god to mete out death to the infidels, and he has a bigger defense budget than even the Vatican could afford. So the new Pope can rest easy there, and focus on the real problems of today: free women and homosexuals, scourges in the lives of straight men everywhere.

I feel for the women in Catholic-run countries. For being women, the Vatican considers us lesser things, and seems to feel that the penis creates certain entitlements to holiness, power, authority and righteousness. And for claiming that I am a human being entitled to equal rights and protection, I'm marked by them as evil.

Well, that street goes both ways.
Is this blasphemy if I'm not a Catholic? I don't know. But when it comes down to it, I don't really give a hoot about who the Pope is. It's six of one, a half dozen of the other.

So there it is. Now if you'll excuse me, I was looking for the path of the Dharma. It was around here somewhere....

0
About author
User picture

media girl also blogs at other places.

Comments

laurentayloris's picture

Dear Media Girl,

I love your post. I also really admire your sensitivity to the religious sensibilities of others. I mean your "religious content" warning, of course.

I only wish I could be so kind. I used to be. In fact, there was a time when I would have stood up and defended the blond haired, blue eyed Republikan Jesus. (Not to be confused with Wal-Mart Jesus who usually shows up in early November to help get gross sales up for the annual shareholder statements)

So now we have a Pope, arguably the most powerful religious icon in all of Christendom, who knows the Horst Wessel, that SS marching song that the Hitler Youth loved to sing as they marched in perfect columns down the streets of Nuremburg and intimidated the "Juden swine."

Yeah, I know, he only belonged for a brief period. . . and "Tex" Williams was only a member of the Manson Family for a brief period.

This world has gone crazy. Sometimes I wonder why I even bothered to quit smoking.

And then I shake off the doom and gloom stuff and get busy trying to do the next thing in front of me that, if done passionately and lovingly, might just make things a little bit better. It's really hard not to RSVP on all the daily invitations to hate, isn't it?

Your blog helps me purge the toxins from my system.

Thanks, Lauren


(21 April 2005 - 12:45am)
Nick's picture
Nick says:

You hit it perfectly. I was going to have a go at the church this morning but one of my blogger mates nailed it as well.

Nick


(21 April 2005 - 2:24am)
Moopaw's picture
Moopaw says:

MediaGirl, your opinions are enjoyable, and apparently you are not Catholic. I was married to a "good" Catholic girl for nearly 13 years, I being Protestant, had a hard time dealing with Catholic opinions. But now I have faith but not religion.

BTW Blasphemy is defined by Websters as

Main Entry: blas·phe·my

Pronunciation: 'blas-f&-mE

Function: noun

Inflected Form(s): plural -mies

1 a : the act of insulting or showing contempt or lack of reverence for God b : the act of claiming the attributes of deity

2 : irreverence toward something considered sacred or inviolable

The office of Pope may be sacred, but you were not irreverent towards the office. The man maybe, the church policies perhaps, remember man invented organized religion not God.

Moopaw


(21 April 2005 - 8:50am)
media girl's picture

Sorry that your comments both were caught in the spam filter. It's still a bit jumpy from all the trackback spam that was coming in.

Like you, I see a distinction between Church and faith. But that doesn't fly, especially with the Catholic dogma that says, among other things, that God does not hear prayers that aren't submitted through proper channels. (Why would God need a beaurocracy?) I did not mean to offend anyone except hypocrites, but then again, as a writer I know that intentions don't mean doodlysquat when it comes to what people take away from the text.

Anyway, thanks for the words of support. :)


(21 April 2005 - 10:28am)
Ole Blue the Heretic's picture

You are right on with the ancient belief system and the asinine logic that people use to keep adhereing to those belief systems.


(21 April 2005 - 12:54pm)
Diane's picture
Diane says:

And it's all coming from the Vatican


(22 April 2005 - 2:49pm)
media girl's picture

Let's keep things in perspective.


(22 April 2005 - 5:29pm)

store

Not Your Emininent Domain!

Buy stuff here.

» My own blasphemy