» Big Brother for bloggers, cont'd
6 March 2005 - 12:08pm
Big Brother for bloggers, cont'd
By media girl
Recommended reading and discussion:
Armando on DKos has been digging around, and found some quotes from FEC commissioners on the question of whether they should be regulating the internet as it relates to campaigns. His preliminary conclusion: it's the GOP itching to pull on the e-jack boots.
Similar entries
store
Buy stuff here.
» Big Brother for bloggers, cont'd





















Comments
There is no need to freak about the freaking freedom of the internet, no reason to fear blogs being shut down, no reason to worry that some cop plain clothed, undercover, out of the closet, in your face or otherwise is going to break down your door, arrest you, and haul off your hard drive for writing nasty thoughts about some dork you tangled with while you were hanging with your homies on the intenet. Or is there? When the yelling dies down, the story is more limited for now.
Nobody really cares about a bunch of maladapted male bloggers making merry mayhem with witty, stark, stiletto, dark snark yet. Or do they? You don't care? I'll make you care.
In the Age of Rather, Eason, and Gannon, always smooth sailing official Washington and the flotsam floating on the mainstream have only lately come to terms with the pea shooting pesty bloggers picking them all off from the shore. The time for righteous peashooters to worry about what the effect all their peashooting, no, make that peeing on the legs of the powerful has had is several more gazes in the navel away.
In the Age of Michael Powell and Janet Jackson's boob gone ballistic, everyone freaks when they hear the word regulation. While the Bush Boyz claim freedom, freedom everywhere and yet always suppress liberty somewhere closer to home, all this talk about regulation and blogs relates in a limited sense to blogs either openly or not so openly in service to a political campaign
This is not yet regulation upon the free citizens of Blogostan. Or is it?