23 February 2005 - 8:46am
Guckert fiasco -- a nickel plated Greek Tragedy
Randy Shilts' last book was [url=http://www.zmag.org/ZMag/articles/may94bronski.htm]"Conduct Unbecoming."[/url] It was published just before his untimely death due to AIDS. The book was not just about gays in the military, but gays in government. If Shilts is to be believed, there is at least one man on the Supreme Court who is homosexual and that at one point, the head of the United States Marine Corp was a gay four-star general married to a lesbian - also a high ranking military officer- a marriage of convenience and form.
A reasonable person would say "who cares?" Who cares what people want to do in their bedrooms and what's it to us? We might feel badly for people who are gay and who merely want to serve the country they love, but who are hounded because of a sexual proclivity.
Why this Guckert fiasco is so poignant is that it plays out like a nickel plated Greek Tragedy.
The Republicans openly campaigned with a political platform that is against same-sex marriage to the point that they want a constitutional amendment to prevent states from allowing it. Yet it would seem there are gay people at the highest levels of influence inside the White House who hypocritically denounce homosexuality when they are embroiled in some sort of gay network that operates in close proximity to the President.
The Republicans toughen national security measures, yet a man using a false name waltzes into the White House to put easy questions to the President. What kind of "gay cell" is working its way around the microscope that ever further probes the daily lives of ordinary citizens? The security services around the President want us to believe that no one knew Guckert's true identity? Either they are liars or buffoons.
In the 1950's, it was said homosexuals were a security risk because they could be blackmailed. Homosexual activists said: destigmatize homosexuality and stop making it illegal and there is nothing to blackmail, about.
Now the chickens have come home to roost The political party that wants to curb homosexuality is itself suffering from the "infection." Years back, in an episode called "The Changeling," Captain Kirk got rid of a robot called [url=http://soundwavs.trekkieguy.com/32.html]Nomad[/url] by pointing out the error of its logic. There are [url=http://soundwavs.trekkieguy.com/2/32/nomad.wav]wav[/url] files that some will recall. Sorta fun to listen to, yet, again tragic. Maybe it is Biblical. Maybe we recall: judge not least ye be judged. So we see what happens when someone sets out to inherit the wind.
It would give me no pleasure to attack the GOP because there are homosexuals in the GOP. I hope those who are outraged at the Guckert scandal will not turn it into an opportunity to make anti-gay remarks or put downs. Being gay is not at issue. What is at issue is the mental stability of those who are so filled with gay shame and fear that they will actually attack themselves and their fellows in order to keep from being outed.
And to show how crazy it can get, to operate a gay-boy solicitation web site, be associated with the White House and then to think they would not be caught? If they think that, they are either crazy or this network extends very high and is [i]very[/i] powerful.
Or was the pressure of the closet too much and this is how they have chosen to out themselves?
As Shakespeare said, if this were played upon a stage, it would not be believed.
Similar entries
store
Buy stuff here.




















Comments
I do think Gannon outed himself on some level. But I think you have to add to the mix the reality that anything that happens regarding the Bush White House is okay. If we learned that a cabinet member was an ax murderer, the media would sweep right by the issue and liberals would be attacked for "criticizing" ax murdering.
I am ready for every right-wing gay and bisexual official to be outed. I don't give a damn about their internalized homophobia, but what they do to thousands of others is obscene.
I would be hard pressed to attack a GOP person for being gay. Some time ago I decided that a person's sexual orientation is none of my business unless I am contemplating having a sexual relationship with that person. If I am okay with a person being gay, then his/her political beliefs are not relevant and vice versa.
I think where both you and I, Diane, might be coming from, is the idea of the hypocrisy of it all - that one party, at least via lip service, defends homosexual rights - while another attacks - yet both have gay voters/supporters and even gay leaders.
My point about how powerful this "gay cell" is: They can get their shill into the White House press room. They can get him a press pass. They can sidestep background checks. The man can be running a "business," if you want to call it that, that would be a major embarrassment to the President and those who surround him. The Teflon-factor of the Reagan era still wears well, it would seem.
That they would think that the history of this odd duck would not touch them means that they have complete Hubris, or that they are very high up and very powerful and believe they can withstand exposure, suppress opposition, or believe they are untouchable.
If someone were to field "softball" questions, as Bill Maher call them, why choose [i]this[/i] guy? Or are there others who are already on the payroll, only this is the first we've permitted ourselves to finally notice? And I am haunted about the question I saw on Bill Maher. Guckert asked about people who live in "unreality."
Hmm.
Naturally the MSM got sidetracked on the sex. Don't they all just love sex stories?
But the real concern is not GOP hypocrisy about homosexuality but how someone in the White House got an apparently active prostitute past FBI and Secret Service screening to work under a phony name. It doesn't wash.
It especially doesn't wash when he seems to be connected to the exposure of CIA operative Valerie Plame:
This is from this good summary of the depth and breadth of the scandal so far.
I've briefly worked in the White House press room, pre-911, and even then everyone had to go through a thorough background check; I assume that it's gotten more so now.
The issue is not whether Gannon/Guckert is a homosexual, but how this alleged male prostitute got his press passes? I'd also like to know his press pass name, because it's impossible (through the regular channels) to get one using a nickname or a made-up name.
Secondly, I'm very curious about how Mr. Guckert got inside information, even before the other media got hold of it. For example, he was first to announce the "shock and awe" bombings. The Plame case is another one. How come?
Which leads us to ask a reasonable question: did he have a "special" relationship with anyone in the White House? And, I don't mean anyone like the chef or the cleaning lady... (wink, wink) This is a very legitimate point to explore, and, if it happens to involve sex the juicier it is.
Finally, a true Greek tragedy is also a moral lesson, that a person achieves some kind of understanding, a higher moral ground though katharsis.... I don't think it's the case here! So, please leave my Greeks alone.
It's why I called it "nickel plated" Greek tragedy.
And, [i]yes,[/i] to your point, he would have to be connected well up the food chain to get this access and the trail point "military" at almost every turn, or "intelligence," or someone near the top.
"Gate" has been used as a word and in "GayGate" the smoking gun is that he got into that press room.
What gives?